Vista Online by Friends Of Vista, Inc. - A Texas Nonprofit Corporation | Informative Articles For Your Life | Click Here To Return To Index Page Of Site

How To Legally Back Winning Horses And Dogs After The Result Is Know

By: John Timmons



----------------------------------------- Brooke of Enfield All bets accepted subject to our rules. ----------------------------------------- Stakes: Selection: Time: ----------------------------------------- Silver Lily AS 1400 Golden Lily AS 1700

£1 WIN both selections D-S-A ____________________________

----------- Stake: £2 : p -----------



Deer Punter,

The above perfectly legal wager is the one that ALL bookmakers dislike layying. It's a very punter friendly wager and always only grudgingly accepted, because fortunately for us, bookmaking in The UK is very competitive.

After GOLDEN LILY was a winning horse, the bookie is allowing an additonal £2 of winnings to revert onto SILVER LlLY, which has already won almost three hours previously. Stumble upon two winners and the bookie is generously granting a £6 wager for a £2 stake. My advice is to change betting shops after a pair of nice priced winners - and ditto after the next pair! DOUBLE-STAKES-ABOUT (D-S-A) wagers, will alas only cover two selections but can be used on all anti-post bets, often with months between actual races - hows that then?

With all multiple bets (Yankees, Heinzs, Canadians etc) winnings travel "only" forward. You may believe that when you eventually stumble upon four winning Favs in a Yankee, that winnings from the third and fourth selection have re-verted onto selections one end two - but this is "not" so.

Many shrewd punters sit in a betting shop and do race-by-race win Yankees or Place Only (TOTE) Yankees. This enables them to take a board price about selections 2, 3, and 4 in a win Yankee etc. Race-by-race win and Place-Only mult-iple wagers, would be impossible to do, if winnings or stakes were to reverse.

No UK book maker will accept a place-only Multiple wager, yet most will accept 8 "place only" Single, at Tote odds. Why not sit in a betting shop and do a "place only", Three Doubles and a Treble? Simp1y place three points on the first selection and reserve one-point for selection two end write "place only" on both wagers. If selection-one is placed, place the total return (plus the set-aside one-point), onto selection-two; DEDUCT1NG one-third of one's return, for I and 3 place double. If selection two is placed, remove the place-double (I and 2) and place everything onto selection-three. If selection-three is placed, the return will yield two one-point place doubles and a one-point treble. When selection-two is unplaced, remember to put on the 1 and 3 place-double.

There is no way whatsoever you can sit in a betting shop and do a race-by-race D-S-A wager. You can sit there for ever, without improving it. One of the main reasons that horse racing bookies rarely go bust (or ride push bikes!), is the sad fact that most punters do not know how to lay their money out in the most effective way. Almost all wagers can be re-written more punter-friendly, with no additional outlay. My page one example wager cannot be improved upon, and if adhered to religiously, your local bookie will soon be requesting you to take your business elsewhere!

D-S-A wagers can't be successfully "hedged". The Big Three uk book makers will not accept a D-S-A from a fellow bookie. All three will accept them from shop or credit punters, but only for nominal stakes.

Once they have taken the example wager on page-one, all any manager can do, hedging-wise, is this:

£1 win double S.L. and G.L. - if lose S.L. then £1 w G.L. £2 staked. This is fine if both win and it's OK if S.L. loses and G.L. wins, BUT, if S.L. wins at say 14/1 and G.L. loses, then the shop have lost almost £12 attempting to win £2. Add a few noughts and you can easily see how they can fall into the brown 'n smelly!

If the D-S-A doesn't improve your punting-winnings, then your method of selection requires abandoning and not the wager.

Most horse winners are in the 3/1 to 14/I price-band and I suggest you restrict your selections to this price-range. Some horses at 10/1 have wonderful chances of winning, but a greyhound at this price has little chance of winning and should be avoided. Don't consider dogs priced over 6/1 or horses over 6/1 in small fields (3-6 runners). Finally, always remember it is "only" D-S-A users, that can manipulate 2 points onto the winner of the first-race, five minutes after the winner of the final-race of the day has weighed-in.

Please give the D-S-A wager a long and fair trial. It's the sole reason I've made the horses pay for the past five decades.

My most successful, profitable approach is to select five horses (never dogs) and to do any pair (10). Thus: "any pair (10), 1pt win both selections. D-S-A. A line is drawn under the instructions and 20pts are entered into the "stake box" (choose your own stakes). In the event of three 4/1 winners (from five), not impossible, the pre-tax return is 96pts. This is almost 4/1 to your outlay (96/100ths of 4/1) for being only 3/5ths correct. This is far easier than "banking" on one of the five and sploshing on 20pts - and praying!

The 96pts are arrived at thus: 6 x 1pt singles at 4/1 = 30pts. 6 x 2pt singles at 4/1 (less 2pts each single) = 48pts. 6 x 1pt singles (all three winners x both losers) less 2pts each single = 18pts. A 7/1 winner and four losers yields a pre-tax 24pts (8pts, less 2pts, x 4).

Four or five decent priced winning horses and you'll require a barrow - and a change of shops! This is a perfectly legal wager and most betting shops now use automatic calculating machines. Whereby the S.P. stake and wager are fed in to the machine and at the press of a button, the machine settles the wager - tax paid or unpaid.

Article Source: http://www.friendsofvista.org/articles/article26015.html





Related Articles

United States Obituary Collection Is Growing - Quinn Redmond
Balancing Your Legal Scorecard - Part 2 - Richard Hall
Is A Doctor's Past Legal History Admissibile In My Current Lawsuit? - Gerry Oginski
Is It Legal? - Indecent Naming With Tradition - Wolfgang Nedobity
The Nursing Mom's Legal Rights - Nanette Gomez
Payday Loans - The Legal Loan Sharking Industry - R Vigil
Why AutoResponders Can Be Legally Required - Brian Kindsvater
Getting Legal Help For An Asbestos Related Injury - MesotheliomaFirms.com
A Discussion Of Major Lawsuits Faced By Sears Roebuck And Co - Tom Samus
Excessive Bank Account And Credit Card Charges Attacked As Unfair And Possibly Illegal - Michael Hanna
   

 
Copyright © 2008 Friends of Vista, Inc. TM - A Texas Nonprofit Corporation
Privacy Statement | Contact Us